Monday, June 27, 2016

R. v. Pourlotfali, 2016 ONCA 490 (CanLII)

http://ift.tt/28N6WP7

even if the respondent believed the shopper was 19, it was not sufficient that she held this belief after asking for and examining identification that showed she was under age. The respondent’s “human error” did not afford her a defence as it was not a be

The post R. v. Pourlotfali, 2016 ONCA 490 (CanLII) appeared first on The Center.



Smoking Cessation Feeds

http://ift.tt/1PDRweS June 27, 2016 at 04:11AM

No comments:

Post a Comment